Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) Maturity Assessment Model
Based on the U.S. Department of Defense policy and the Congressional legislative framework, a multidimensional evaluation system integrating technical characteristics and commercial practices is studied.
Detail
Published
23/12/2025
Key Chapter Title List
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Background
- Congressional Guidance
- U.S. DoD and Service MOSA Directives and Guidance
- Early Attempts at MOSA Assessment
- MOSA Maturity
- Data and Interface Maturity
- MOSA Maturity Model
- Why This Approach is Different
- Application Path
- Application Barriers
- Conclusion
Document Introduction
For a long time, U.S. defense acquisition leadership has advocated for the value of the Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA), yet related practices have consistently lacked uniformity. To address this issue, this report proposes the concept of "MOSA Maturity," constructing an assessment framework capable of evaluating whether a program, system, or enterprise meets MOSA-related policy objectives in terms of business, technical, and organizational models.
The report first outlines the core value and implementation principles of MOSA, emphasizing its role as an architectural constraint that requires balancing modularity and openness with other architectural requirements such as performance and security. Its key benefits include enhancing competition, facilitating technology refresh, integrating innovation, saving costs, and improving interoperability. Simultaneously, the report provides a detailed analysis of the statutory requirements for MOSA implementation in the Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (FY-21 NDAA), including core elements such as modular design, interface standards, technical data rights, as well as the guiding role of related policy documents like DoD Instruction 5000.02.
When reviewing early attempts at MOSA assessment, the report systematically analyzes the strengths and limitations of tools and methods such as the MOSA Program Assessment and Rating Tool (MOSA PART), Open Architecture Assessment Tool (OAAT), Navy Open Architecture Questionnaire (NOA Questionnaire), the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)) MOSA Assessment Criteria, and the Open Systems Verification Demonstration (OSVD), providing a practical foundation for the construction of the new model.
The core section of the report proposes the MOSA Maturity Model. This model integrates Congressional legislative requirements and DoD acquisition policy needs, establishing an assessment system encompassing both business and technical dimensions with multiple maturity levels. Through specific scenario-based questions, the model comprehensively evaluates the effectiveness of MOSA implementation from various aspects including module scalability, interface standardization, intellectual property strategy, and competition mechanisms. Furthermore, the report discusses supporting models such as the Interface Documentation Maturity Level (IDML), as well as the application of the Open Systems Architecture Configurability Rating Checklist tool in cost estimation.
Finally, the report clarifies the application path and potential barriers for this maturity model. It proposes steps to promote model implementation through verification measures, policy support, data collection, and analysis. It also points out that issues such as a shortage of independent verification talent and inconsistent implementation across services may affect assessment effectiveness. This model provides a standardized, actionable MOSA assessment tool for defense acquisition programs, contributing to the enhancement of U.S. defense system interoperability, innovation capability, and cost-effectiveness, offering decision support for policymakers and program managers.