Files / Russia

The Soviet Union's agricultural biological warfare program

Based on decrypted archives, interviews with individuals involved, and on-site investigations of facilities, this work comprehensively reveals the origins, expansion, operations, and legacy of the large-scale anti-crop and anti-livestock biological weapons research and development network (codenamed "Ecology") led by the Soviet Ministry of Agriculture during the Cold War.

Detail

Published

22/12/2025

Key Chapter Title List

  1. Introduction
  2. Origins: The International Anti-Crop and Anti-Livestock Biological Weapons R&D Race
  3. Codename "Ekologiya": Khrushchev and the Launch of the Soviet Large-Scale Agricultural Biowarfare Program
  4. From Estonia to Sakhalin: The Expansion of the Soviet Ministry of Agriculture's "Toxic Archipelago" in the 1970s-1980s
  5. Heart of Darkness: The Creation of Viral Agent Reserve Mobilization Production Capacity
  6. Perspective Through the Fog: Analysis of the Soviet Military-Agricultural R&D Program
  7. From Military to Agro-Industrial Complex: The Legacy of Post-Soviet States' Agricultural Biowarfare Programs
  8. Conclusion

Document Introduction

This study provides the first comprehensive exposure of an unprecedented, highly secretive agricultural biowarfare program implemented by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Codenamed "Ekologiya" (Ecology), this program was secretly operated by the "Main Directorate for Scientific Research and Experimental Production Institutions" (GUNIiEPU) under the Soviet Ministry of Agriculture. Formally launched by Decree No. 909-426 of the CPSU Central Committee and the Council of Ministers in 1958, this network employed approximately 10,000 personnel at its peak, accounting for about one-quarter to one-sixth of the entire massive Soviet biological weapons program workforce. Its scale surpassed historical biological weapons programs of the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

The report systematically traces the program's origins, noting its roots in early research on plant and animal pathogens by the People's Commissariat of Agriculture around World War II, and its significant influence from post-war acquisition of German (e.g., Insel Riems Institute) and Japanese related biowarfare technologies. The study argues that the United States' offensive program to develop anti-crop and anti-livestock biological weapons in the post-war period was one of the key factors triggering the Soviet Union's launch of the large-scale "Ekologiya" program. Initially, the program focused on screening unmodified, high-virulence pathogens using classical microbiology methods, targeting the crops and livestock of potential adversary nations (primarily the United States and its allies, and possibly including China).

Following the signing of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, the Soviet agricultural biowarfare program did not scale back; instead, it entered a phase of intensification and expansion during the 1970s and 1980s. The report details how the network during this period established or expanded numerous facilities in locations such as Estonia, Armenia, and Tajikistan, shifting its research focus to molecular biology and genetic engineering aimed at developing genetically engineered pathogens with novel properties. The Soviet Union also attempted to acquire new, highly virulent pathogens through its overseas laboratories in Congo and Ethiopia.

The research is based on the author's interviews with 64 former "Ekologiya" program scientists conducted between 1995 and 2004, as well as field investigations of former biowarfare facilities distributed across Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, and other locations. The report reveals the program's stringent secrecy regime, its limited connections with the Soviet Ministry of Defense and the "Biopreparat" system, its vast reserve mobilization production capacity (e.g., the Pokrov Plant for Biopreparations), and safety incidents that occurred during the program's implementation (such as the major rinderpest outbreak in Kazakhstan).

Finally, the report analyzes the dissolution of the "Ekologiya" program network after the collapse of the Soviet Union and its lingering issues, including risks of technology proliferation, the conversion of facilities to civilian use, and intervention efforts by Western nations (primarily the US and UK) to prevent the proliferation of weapon technologies and pathogens. This study fills a critical gap in Soviet military and scientific history, providing indispensable in-depth analysis for understanding the development of state-level agricultural biological weapons, their geopolitical drivers, and their implications for contemporary biosecurity and biodefense policies.