Files / United States

U.S. Department of Defense Year Month Day Project Contract List

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the key military contracts released by the U.S. Department of Defense on the day, focusing on energy supply, testing and evaluation, and equipment support. It reveals the strategic trends in recent logistics support, combat power generation, and technical maintenance.

Detail

Published

22/12/2025

Key Chapter Title List

  1. Defense Logistics Agency: Pipeline-Quality Direct Supply Natural Gas Contracts
  2. Air Force: Flight Test Support Services Contract
  3. Air Force: A-29C Fleet Sustainment Contract
  4. Army: Commercial Aircraft Firm-Fixed-Price Contract

Document Introduction

This report is based on the official project contract announcement documents released by the U.S. Department of Defense on March 18, 2025. It aims to provide professional readers with an accurate interpretation of recent developments in U.S. defense procurement. The content focuses on several key contract award announcements published that day, involving multiple military branches and agencies such as the Defense Logistics Agency, the Air Force, and the Army. The contract types cover long-term material supply, specialized testing services, and equipment sustainment support, revealing the U.S. military's priorities and resource allocation directions in areas such as logistical energy support, test and evaluation capabilities, and maintenance of in-service equipment.

The report first details five firm-fixed-price with economic price adjustment natural gas supply contracts awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency Energy. These contracts resulted from a competitive procurement process, have a two-year period with a six-month option to extend, and have a total value exceeding $113 million. They provide pipeline-quality direct supply natural gas to facilities of the U.S. Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and federal civilian agencies across 11 states from Arkansas to Texas. This series of contracts highlights the U.S. military's continued emphasis on the scaled and stable management of critical energy supply chains. Their funding is entirely the responsibility of the using customers based on their respective appropriation types and fiscal years, reflecting a decentralized yet centrally procured logistical support model.

Secondly, the report analyzes two significant contracts awarded by the U.S. Air Force. The first is an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract valued at $30.1 million with Sunshine Aviation Industries, specifically providing flight test support services for the 96th Test Wing and the 96th Cyberspace Test Group, serving the Air Force and the broader Department of Defense research, development, test, and evaluation missions. This contract was a sole-source procurement, underscoring the irreplaceability of specific testing expertise. The second is an A-29C fleet sustainment contract with Sierra Nevada Corporation, valued at no more than $13.08 million. The work includes support for aircraft, training devices, mission planning systems, and various spare parts, aiming to maintain the operational readiness of this special mission aircraft.

Finally, the report mentions a commercial aircraft firm-fixed-price contract awarded by the U.S. Army to Bell Textron Inc., valued at over $26.03 million. This contract was solicited via the internet with only one response received. Specific work locations and funding will be determined with each order. This procurement reflects the Army's ongoing demand for commercial off-the-shelf aviation platforms.

All analyses in this document are strictly based on the text of the original contract announcements, including definitive information such as contract amounts, contractor details, scope of work, performance periods, procurement methods, and contracting activity agencies. No inferences or evaluations beyond the text are made. It aims to provide reliable primary data reference and interpretation for defense research, budget analysis, industry trend tracking, and security policy makers.