Files / United States

Year Month Day Analysis Report of the U.S. Department of Defense Project Contract List

Based on the original procurement announcement, analyze defense logistics, Army-specific programs, and small business participation models to assess the strategic priorities of recent U.S. military supply chain support and facility maintenance.

Detail

Published

22/12/2025

Key Chapter Title List

  1. Defense Logistics Agency Contract Overview
  2. Facility Maintenance and Operations Supply Contract Analysis
  3. Specialized Material Procurement: Intermediate Cold Weather Flight Gloves
  4. Critical Component Support: Aircraft Main Wheel Assemblies
  5. Army Contract Modifications and Specialized Support
  6. Military Medical and Personnel Services Procurement
  7. Critical Infrastructure Security Modification Project
  8. Military Entrance Processing Station Physical Examination and Record Review Services
  9. Role of Small Businesses in Defense Procurement
  10. Contract Funding Sources and Execution Period
  11. Procurement Methods and Competitive Analysis
  12. Execution Locations and Using Unit Distribution

Document Introduction

This report is based on a systematic review and analysis of defense procurement projects involved in the contract award list publicly released by the U.S. Department of Defense on April 14, 2025. The report aims to provide professional researchers with an interpretation of raw data and a preliminary assessment regarding recent trends in U.S. military logistics support, equipment maintenance, and specialized service procurement. The document's content is sourced directly from official announcements, ensuring a high degree of accuracy and timeliness of information. It serves as primary source material for observing the operations of the U.S. military supply chain, the allocation of financial resources, and the contractor ecosystem.

The report first focuses on three significant contracts awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). Among them, SupplyCore Inc. was awarded a contract with a maximum value of $75 million for facility maintenance, repair, and operations supplies. This contract was a sole-source procurement, with execution in Alaska and serving all military branches, highlighting the urgent need to maintain normal infrastructure operations in key strategic regions. Another contract awarded to Carter Enterprises involves intermediate cold weather flight gloves, generated through competitive procurement, reflecting continued investment in personal protective equipment for specific climatic conditions. Furthermore, the contract for aircraft main wheel assemblies awarded to Aircraft Wheel and Brake, also a sole-source procurement, ensures the supply security of critical flight components for the Air Force.

The second part of the report delves into multiple contracts awarded by the U.S. Army. The contract modification exceeding $52 million awarded to Northrop Grumman aims to support warfighter exercises, training, and logistics, demonstrating the emphasis on sustained readiness training. The contract of nearly $50 million awarded to Acuity International for providing physicians and medical services illustrates the trend of outsourcing military medical services. The contract exceeding $31 million awarded to Barnard Construction is directly related to modifications of the Prado Dam to reduce dam safety risks, belonging to a defense-related security project for critical civilian infrastructure. The contract awarded to Chenega Tri-Services focuses on physical examination services for Military Entrance Processing Stations, representing a crucial safeguard in the personnel recruitment process.

The analytical basis of this report is strictly limited to the contract amounts, contractor information, procurement justifications (e.g., "sole source" or "competitive procurement"), execution periods, using military services, funding sources, and contracting activity agencies disclosed in the document. Notably, the significant participation of small businesses (marked with *) is a prominent feature of this procurement list. The report does not extend speculation regarding the strategic intent, geopolitical implications, or contractor backgrounds behind the contracts. All conclusions are based on the induction and classification of textual facts, aiming to provide solid raw data support for subsequent research on supply chain resilience, defense budget analysis, and industrial base assessment.