Russian "Shadow Fleet": Threat Exposure and Response Strategies
Focusing on the mechanisms, scale, impact, multidimensional risks, and international countermeasures of sanctions evasion in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict (1)
Detail
Published
23/12/2025
Key Chapter Title List
- Energy Sanctions: Oil Price Cap
- Russia's "Shadow Fleet": Scale, Impact, and Associated Risks
- Definition and Criteria for "Shadow Fleet"
- The Role of P&I Insurance and the International Group System
- Operational Mechanisms of Russia's "Shadow Fleet"
- Flag State Responsibility and Regulatory Loopholes
- Deceptive Tactics for Sanctions Evasion
- Scale Data and Transport Volume Statistics
- Destination and Route Distribution
- Environmental and Maritime Safety Hazards
- Security Threats and Geopolitical Impact
- International Actions and Recommendations to Counter Russia's "Shadow Fleet"
Document Introduction
Following the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the EU, the G7, and their allies imposed extensive sanctions on Russia, including a maritime oil import ban and a price cap, aimed at curtailing its sources of war funding. In response, to circumvent sanctions and maintain oil export revenues, Russia actively explored new markets and established a "shadow fleet," a phenomenon that has become a core issue of international concern.
This report systematically examines the definitional controversies surrounding "shadow fleet," "dark fleet," and "gray fleet," focusing on the differences between the narrow definition by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the broader academic definition. It clarifies the core characteristics of this fleet: the lack of Western insurance and ownership by non-EU/G7 entities. The report details the three primary pathways Russia used to build its "shadow fleet": transferring existing Russian-owned tankers, acquiring old tankers over 15 years of age, and retrofitting superannuated tankers over 20 years old, with a total investment reaching $100 billion.
At the operational level, the report reveals the various deceptive tactics employed by the "shadow fleet," including the use of flags of convenience, complex ownership structures, ship-to-ship transfers, and the disabling and spoofing of the Automatic Identification System (AIS), as well as the roles of countries like the UAE, China, and India in providing management services. Data shows that as of June 2024, this fleet transports an average of 4.1 million barrels of Russian oil per day, accounting for 70% of its maritime exports, primarily to countries like India, China, and Turkey, with activity in key shipping lanes increasing by hundreds of times.
The "shadow fleet" poses three serious threats: over 72% of the vessels are old, leading to a sharp increase in maritime safety risks such as collisions and oil spills, with over 50 related incidents already occurring; the lack of proper P&I insurance exacerbates environmental pollution consequences and compensation difficulties; and some vessels are alleged to be involved in monitoring critical infrastructure, constituting a geopolitical security threat.
The report also comprehensively presents the international community's response measures, including targeted provisions in multiple rounds of EU sanctions, specialized sanctions by the US and UK, relevant IMO resolutions, and academic recommendations such as strengthening insurance oversight, expanding the scope of sanctions, and upgrading waterway control. The European Parliament, in October 2024, called for enhanced maritime surveillance and sanctions enforcement and plans to adopt a specific resolution on this in November, highlighting the urgency and importance of this issue.
Based on authoritative data and investigations from institutions such as the Kyiv School of Economics (KSE), Windward, and the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), this report provides a core reference for understanding the dynamic game of sanctions and countermeasures, assessing maritime safety risks, and formulating effective response strategies.